Self-Practice Program for Beating-Heart Minimally Invasive Coronary Anastomosis Using a Homemade Low-Fidelity Simulator: A Proof of Concept.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effectiveness of a consistent and structured self-practice coronary anastomosis program using a homemade low-fidelity beating-heart simulator. METHODS: An intermediary trainee was subjected to an 8-week structured self-practice program. The program was divided into 2 parts of nonbeating and beating practices with a minimum number of timed anastomoses. Each part was followed by an assessment using an objective skills assessment tool score. The beating-heart simulator was built using motorized toy blocks connected wirelessly to a smartphone application. This was coded to enable rate selection. A junior consultant was compared to the subject at the end of the program. Both were tasked to perform 1 coronary anastomosis for both off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and minimally invasive CAB (MICS) setup. The primary outcomes were anastomotic time and score compared with the junior consultant. Secondary outcomes were progression of anastomotic time and score throughout the program. RESULTS: Overall performance of the studied subject approached the performance of the junior consultant in terms of time (OPCAB, 489 vs 605 s; MICS, 712 vs 652 s) and scores (OPCAB, 21 vs 20.7; MICS, 19 vs 20.6). There were inverse correlations between anastomosis time and number of practices for both nonbeating and beating anastomoses. Overall improvement was observed in terms of assessment scoring by 26.6%. CONCLUSIONS: A structured self-practice program using an affordable and accessible simulator was able to help trainees overcome the MICS anastomosis learning curve quicker when introduced earlier. This may encourage earlier adoption of MICS among surgeons.

Transit time flow measurement and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting for surgeon and trainee.

BACKGROUND: Trainees need to operate under appropriate supervision to become competent. Transit time flow measurement (TTFM) is useful in detecting intraoperative graft failures during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aims to compare the intra- and postoperative outcomes, including TTFM, of isolated CABG performed by a single consultant versus trainees and to determine the relationship between the pulsatility index (PI) and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included 155 isolated CABG cases. Intraoperative outcomes included duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp and TTFM for arterial and venous grafts. Postoperative outcomes included common postoperative complications and mortality. The odds ratios of postoperative complications and mortality for arterial and venous grafts with PI ≤3 relative to grafts with PI >3 were determined with multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The duration of CPB and aortic cross-clamp was significantly shorter in the consultant's group. TTFM for both arterial and venous grafts were similar and no significant differences in postoperative complications and mortality were detected between the two groups. Patients with arterial grafts with PI ≤3 were less likely to require an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or be ventilated for a prolonged period. No significant differences in postoperative outcomes and mortality were detected between venous grafts with PI ≤3 and PI >3. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees can achieve good results in isolated CABG with appropriate case selection. Patients with arterial grafts with PI ≤3 have better postoperative outcomes.